Cases 1 - 8 of 8
VISCONTI v. NEWSOM et al
as 1:2023cv03277
Plaintiff:
MAHA VISCONTI
Defendant:
GAVIN NEWSOM, CENTURY REGIONAL DET FACILITY, ANGELA D. WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huertas Danner, Jr. et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2023cv01517
Plaintiff:
Andres Huertas Danner, Jr., Alan A. Chiras, Alejandro Sia and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huertas Danner, Jr. et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Andres Huertas Danner, Jr., Alan A. Chiras, Alejandro Sia and others
Defendant:
Jonathan Matthews and Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Angela Walton v. NC Dept Agriculture
as 12-1012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELA D. WALTON
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES and ROBERT N. BROGDEN, JR.
Angela Walton v. Mortgage Electronic Registrati, et al
as 11-56023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGELA D. WALTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC., CHASE HOME LOAN FINANCE LLC and DOES, 1 through 20 inclusive
Angela D Walton v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02445
Defendant:
Chase Home Loan Finance LLC, Does and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc
Plaintiff:
Angela D Walton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Walton v. North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services et al
as 5:2009cv00302
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and Robert N. Brogden, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Angela D. Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
