Cases 81 - 90 of 488
Gary Perkins v. C. Angulo, et al
as 22-55114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY RONNELL PERKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
C. ANGULO, Correctional Counselor at Centinela State Prison, T. RAYBON, Correctional Counselor II at Centinela State Prison and J. BERNAL, Captain at Centinela State Prison
ANGULO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ANGULO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANGULO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv63427
Plaintiff:
MARTIN ANGULO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Silverman v. Mendocino County et al
as 5:2021cv08054
Plaintiff:
Jacob S. Silverman
Defendant:
Mendocino County, Deputy Tom Allman, Captain Pearse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Aguilar
as 21-11013
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Antonio Angulo Aguilar
Dearborn Life Insurance Company v. Isaac et al
as 1:2021cv00785
Plaintiff:
Dearborn Life Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas
Defendant:
Marianna Angulo Isaac and Edna Patino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Manuel Banderas v. Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv01369
Plaintiff:
Manuel Banderas
Defendant:
Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Inc., Melina Angulo and Does 1-20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Angulo v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2021cv00230
Defendant:
Cardyn Ellsworth, Diana Sullivan, Nancy Lemcke and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Angulo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv21219
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
