Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Garcia v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00957
Plaintiff:
Anibal Melendez Garcia
Defendant:
Robert May, Cpt. Dotson, Orlando DeJesus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez v. Dimico et al
as 1:2018cv00674
Plaintiff:
Anibal Melendez
Defendant:
Dimico, Sr and Dimico, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watchtower Bible And Tract Society of New York et al v. Municipality of Aguada et al
as 3:2016cv01207
Plaintiff:
Watchtower Bible And Tract Society of New York and Congregacion Cristiana De Los Testigos De Jehova
Defendant:
Municipality of Aguada , Jessie Cortes- Ramos, Municipality of Aguas Buenas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitfield, et al v. Municipality of Faja, et al
as 14-2216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN LEE WHITFIELD, TERRY WHITFIELD and GAIL WHITFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
MUNICIPALITY OF FAJARDO, ISMAEL ALVAREZ, MARIA L. LEBRON-RAMOS and others
:
and
Anibal Melendez v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 13-2042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANIBAL MELENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN PERRY PHELPS and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Melendez v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00223
Petitioner:
Anibal Melendez
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Delaware, State of Delaware and Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitfield, et al v. Municipality of Faja, et al
as 08-1004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JUSTIN LEE WHITFIELD, TERRY WHITFIELD and GAIL WHITFIELD
Defendant - Appellant:
MUNICIPALITY OF FAJARDO
Defendant:
ISMAEL ALVAREZ, MARIA L. LEBRON-RAMOS, WILLIAM MANGOME-ROLDAN and others
:
and
Whitfield, et al v. Mun. of Fajardo, et al
as 3:2001cv02647
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Whitfield , Terry Whitfield , Gail Whitfield and others
Defendant:
Municipality of Fajardo , Anibal Melendez-Rivera , Ismael Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
