Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Harris v. Justice Center Multnomah County Jail et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01739
Plaintiff: Tera Ann Harris
Defendant: Justice Center Multnomah County Jail, Sheriff's Office and Multnomah County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01621
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harris v. State of Oregon
as 3:2022cv01501
Petitioner: Tera Anne Harris
Respondent: State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RIDLEY v. EMMERSEN et al
as 1:2022cv00043
Plaintiff: EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Defendant: JUDGE DAVID EMMERSEN, JUDGE ANN HARRIS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIDLEY v. DOE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00553
Defendant: JANE DOE, BRADFORD RIGBY, ANN HARRIS and others
Plaintiff: EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
harris v. hill
as 2:2018at00184
Petitioner: colleen ann harris
Defendant: molly hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
harris v. hill
as 2:2018at00182
Petitioner: colleen ann harris
Defendant: molly hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
harris v. hill
as 2:2018at00183
Petitioner: Colleen Ann harris
Defendant: molly hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
(HC)Harris v. Hill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00359
Petitioner: Colleen Ann Harris
Respondent: Molly Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Goldstein v. Marshall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00267
Plaintiff: David S. Goldstein
Defendant: John Marshall, Terry McAuliff, Brian Moran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?