Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Lois Gibson v. State of Maryland
as 23-1369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOIS ANN GIBSON, MARYLAND 20-20 WATCH, FREDERICK, MARYLAND, CLASS REPRESENTATIVES PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 23, AND/OR PUTATIVE CLASSES OF SIMILARLY SITUATED VOTERS OF MARYLAND AND/OR ELSEWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF MARYLAND, and Several Agencies of the State, Including at least the State and County Boards of Elections in the Specific Counties Listed herein, A STATE AND NATIONAL RICO ENTERPRISE, IN PART LOCATED IN MARYLAND, AND/OR DOING BUSINESS AS PART OF THE COMMERCE IN MARYLAND WITH COUNTIES, I.E., FREDERICK, HOWARD COUNTY, CARROLL COUNTIES, MARYLAND AND 18 ADDITIONAL COUNTIES OR VOTING JURISDICTIONS, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE (CTCL), A Chicago IRS Code 501 (c) (3) Corporation and others
Gibson et al v. Frederick County Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv01642
Plaintiff:
Louis Ann Gibson, Maryland 20-20 Watch, Amicus Curia and others
Defendant:
Frederick County Maryland, Howard County Maryland, Carroll County Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gibson v. Community Development Partners (CDP) et al
as 3:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Katie A. Gibson and Katie Ann Gibson
Defendant:
Community Development Partners (CDP), Erik Paine, Kelly Paine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Gibson
as 6:2014cv00484
Plaintiff:
Richard Jerome Smith
Defendant:
Loretta Ann Gibson, Melbourne Police Officers, Pat Poole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
