Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 1:2022cv05328
Defendant:
KNUCKLES, KOMOSINSKI & MANFRO, LLP, BERMAN, SAUTER, RECORD & JARDIM, PC, Kemeny, Ramp & Renaud, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B. Garland, John G. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Patterson
as 21-20253
Defendant / Appellant:
Leslie Anne Patterson, Fugitive
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Chris Ann Jaye v. William Barr, et al
as 20-2073
Defendant / Appellee:
James C. Duff, John Does, 16-50, Yolanda Ciccone and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chris Ann Jaye
Jaye v. USA, et al--PER #3 ORDER PLAINTIFF AUTHORIZED TO EMAIL HIS PLEADINGS
as 1:2019cv00121
Defendant:
Mary Melfi, William Barr, Robert E Kirschman and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Ann Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penning v. Intrinsic Tel LLC et al
as 1:2019mi00061
Defendant:
Kerry Reddick, Envision Investments LLC, Earnest Earvin, III and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Penning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Patterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019at00102
Plaintiff:
Valerie Ann Patterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
(SS) Valerie Ann Patterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv00174
Plaintiff:
Valerie Ann Patterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
