Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Baca v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02043
Petitioner:
Damien Anthony Baca
Respondent:
Warden D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States v. Baca
as 23-1267
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAMIEN ANTHONY BACA
Baca vs. GlaxoSmithKline LLC., et al.
as 3:2023cv11310
Defendant:
Anthony Baca, GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(SS) Baca v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01543
Plaintiff:
Anthony Baca
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Baca v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv02461
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Baca
Defendant:
Jonathan Anderson, City of San Jose, Michael Joseph Simonini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baca v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00769
Petitioner:
Anthony Baca
Respondent:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Viacom International, Inc v. Baca et al
as 1:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
Viacom International, Inc
Defendant:
Mark Anthony Baca and Guardian Anti-Bullying Campaign, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Armida Garcia-Santana v. John Anthony Baca et al
as 2:2016cv00397
Defendant:
Helen Baca, John Anthony Baca and Doe I through Doe III
Plaintiff:
Armida Garcia-Santana
Chavez v. Alderete et al
as 1:2013cv00774
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Chavez
Defendant:
Peter Alderete and Anthony Baca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tesch et al v. Martinez et al
as 2:2013cv00525
Plaintiff:
Gary Tesch, Brian Lassiter, Osie Fields and others
Defendant:
Susanna Martinez, Greg Mercantile, Jerry Roark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
