Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Anthony Bailey v. Clark County D.A. Office, et al
as 10-17672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK COUNTY D.A. OFFICE, DAVID ROGER and CLARK COUNTY DEPUTY D.A.
Bailey v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv08043
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Anthony Bailey v. Douglas Gillespie, et al
as 10-16453
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY BAILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DOUGLAS GILLESPIE and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Bailey v. Clark County D.A. Office et al
as 2:2010cv01012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Defendant:
Clark County D.A. Office, Clark County Deputy D.A. and David Roger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Bailey v. State of California et al
as 5:2010cv00927
Petitioner:
Anthony Bailey
Respondent:
Board of Parole Hearings, Department of Corrections and State of California
Bailey v. State of California et al
as 2:2010cv01187
Petitioner:
Anthony Bailey
Respondent:
State of California, Department of Corrections and Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv01140
Petitioner:
John Anthony Bailey
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ray Bailey v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-20119
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAY ANTHONY BAILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
US v. Courtney Bailey
as 09-6331
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
COURTNEY ANTHONY BAILEY
BAILEY v. KAY
as 1:2009cv00255
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY ANTHONY BAILEY
Defendant:
ALAN KAY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
