Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Salaman v. New Haven et al
as 3:2019cv00577
Plaintiff:
Luis Angel Salaman
Defendant:
James Murcko, States Attorney's Office, Joseph Galvan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Hanson et al
as 1:2017cv01024
Plaintiff:
Anthony Campbell
Defendant:
Hanson, Department of Correction of N.Y.C., New York City Health and Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Barber et al
as 1:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
Albert Anthony Campbell
Defendant:
Mark Allen Barber, Joyce Morris, Michelle Lastrapes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. State of New York Board of Examiners of Sex offenders et al
as 1:2016cv09816
Plaintiff:
Anthony Campbell
Defendant:
State of New York Board of Examiners of Sex offenders, Sex Offender Registry Board and Sex Offender Registration Act
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keyes v. The People of The State of New York et al
as 2:2016cv05485
Defendant:
1 Police Plaza, Attorney General, Anthony Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Keysean L Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
as 1:2016cv22821
Plaintiff:
Rayae Anthony Campbell
Defendant:
Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. Dept. of Homeland Security
as 1:2012cv05989
Petitioner:
Anthony Campbell
Respondent:
Dept. of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Campbell v. USA
as 3:2012cv01047
Petitioner:
Anthony Campbell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Campbell v. Stalcup et al
as 5:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
Anthony Campbell
Defendant:
Wallace Stalcup and Elida Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Campbell v. Kenzie Bond, et al
as 09-20362
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ANTHONY CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
KENZIE A BOND, KIMBERLY S. MOORE, Sergeant, DONNA K. CABEEN, Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
