Cases 1 - 10 of 42
United States of America v. Nunez (Rodriguez?Rosario)
as 25-2647
Defendant:
JOWENKY NUNEZ, JR., JERRIN PENA, ARIEL OLIVER and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Nunez (Hernandez)
as 25-2643
Defendant:
JERRIN PENA, ARIEL OLIVER, JUSTIN DEAZA and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Nunez
as 25-2653
Defendant:
JERRIN PENA, ARIEL OLIVER, JUSTIN DEAZA and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(HC) Castillo v. Macomber
as 1:2024cv01586
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber
Petitioner:
Manuel Anthony Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. The City of Hazleton et al
as 3:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Isaias Manuel Garcia
Defendant:
The City of Hazleton, Jonathan A Leonard, Eric Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rendon et al v. Community Mobile Testing, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08744
Plaintiff:
Marco Rendon, Ashley Salkey, Javonna Jenkins and others
Defendant:
Community Mobile Testing, Inc. and LabQ Clinical Diagnostics LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rendon et al v. Community Mobile Testing, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08631
Plaintiff:
Marco Rendon, Ashley Salkey, Javonna Jenkins and others
Defendant:
Community Mobile Testing, Inc. and LabQ Clinical Diagnostics LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CASTILLO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04766
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CASTILLO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In re: Sanchez
as 23-6137
Petitioner:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Sanchez v. Quick
as 23-6132
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
