Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Shane Anthony Forrester v. Merrick Garland
as 21-1360
Petitioner:
SHANE RAYON ANTHONY FORRESTER
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Forrester v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv00872
Petitioner:
Shane Anthony Forrester
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02766
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00531
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Forrester v. USA
as 6:2015cv00141
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shane Anthony Forrester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Forrest v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv03762
Plaintiff:
Floyd Anthony Forrest
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Albert Alto, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 12-56145
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALBERT P. ALTO, ANDRE E. ALTO, ANTHONY ALTO and others
Intervenor - Appellant:
SAN PASQUAL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Defendant:
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, LARRY ECHO HAWK, Assistant Secretary of the Department of the Interior - Indian Affairs, MICHAEL BLACK, Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs of Department of Interior and others
Alto et al v. Salazar et al
as 3:2011cv02276
Plaintiff:
Albert P. Alto , Andre E. Alto , Anthony Alto and others
Defendant:
Ken Salazar , Larry Echo Hawk , Michael Black and others
Amicu:
San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Forrest v. Cullen
as 3:2010cv02954
Petitioner:
Anthony Forrest
Respondent:
Vincent Cullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mercadel et al v. DS Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv08326
Plaintiff:
Lyn Mercadel, Aaron Mercadel, Lyn Mercadel and others
Defendant:
DS Corp. and Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
