Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Rogers et al v. Department of Children Youth and Families et al
as 3:2021cv05248
Defendant:
Marybeth Queral, Department of Children, Youth and Families, Jody Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Joe Rogers, III, Ronald Ackerson, Damien Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Alexander Favor v. Marcia Stevenson-Bridges et al
as 2:2019cv09889
Defendant:
Raquel Harper, Cornelius Micheal Coray, Monee Stevenson and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alexander Favor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARPER v. NOEL et al
as 3:2018cv00202
Defendant:
Dr. PAUL NOEL, SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, JAY COWAN and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HARPER v. NOEL et al
as 2:2018cv04163
Defendant:
DR. PAUL NOEL, SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, CHCA KOWALEWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Harper v. City Hall
as 17-1163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY HALL, Division of Vital Records, Philadelphia, PA 19102
Brandon Favor v. Anthony Harper et al
as 2:2017cv00352
Petitioner:
Brandon Alexandor Favor
Respondent:
Anthony Harper, The People of the State of California and Shacorton Winfrey
Brandon Favor v. Anthony Harper
as 2:2017cv00165
Petitioner:
Brandon Favor
Respondent:
Anthony Harper
Favor v. Harper et al
as 1:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alexandor Favor
Defendant:
Anthony Harper, Shacorton Winfrey and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anthony Harper v. Jawad Salameh, et al
as 16-4329
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY HARPER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAWAD SALAMEH, M.D., CONEMAUGH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, ANNETTE KOWALEWSKI and others
Brandon Favor v. Anthony Harper et al
as 2:2016cv08593
Petitioner:
Brandon Favor
Respondent:
Anthony Harper, The People of the State of California and Shacorton Wimfrey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
