Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jiggetts v. Rommel et al
as 1:2022cv03127
Plaintiff:
Alexander Jiggetts
Defendant:
Sendy Rommel and Anthony Haskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Jiggetts v. Rommel et al
as 1:2022cv01179
Plaintiff:
Alexander Jiggetts
Defendant:
Sendy Rommel, Anthony Haskins and Prolouge Inc/Rivendell Homes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haskins v. McGowan et al
as 1:2020cv01810
Defendant:
Daril Foose, Daniel Rothschild, Tyon Meik and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Haskins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Haskins v. Tice et al
as 1:2016cv02002
Plaintiff:
Anthony Haskins
Defendant:
Eric Tice, Captain Harris, Kelly Everhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haskins v. Tice et al
as 1:2016cv01888
Petitioner:
Anthony Haskins
Respondent:
Eric Tice and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haskins v. Tice et al
as 1:2016cv01697
Petitioner:
Anthony Haskins
Respondent:
Eric Tice and Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haskins v. PA Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv01416
Petitioner:
Anthony Haskins
Respondent:
PA Department of Corrections, Tabb Bickell and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haskins v. Court of Common Pleas et al
as 1:2011cv00706
Petitioner:
Anthony Haskins
Respondent:
Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County District Attorney's Office, PA Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haskins v. DeRose et al
as 1:2010cv02509
Plaintiff:
Anthony Haskins
Defendant:
Dominick DeRose, Tom Toolan and Laura Fishel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haskins v. Dauphin County District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2010cv01950
Petitioner:
Anthony Haskins
Respondent:
Dauphin County District Attorney's Office and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
