Cases 11 - 20 of 23
D.J.Y et al v. Ypsilanti Public Schools et al
as 2:2014cv11467
Plaintiff:
D.J.Y and Kelly York
Defendant:
Ypsilanti Public Schools, Ypsilanti Public School District, Sharron Irvine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENDRICK v. COLVIN
as 5:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY KENDRICK
Defendant:
CAROLYN W COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael Kendrick v. State of Florida, et al
as 10-15477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY KENDRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kendrick v. State Of Florida et al
as 8:2010cv02484
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Kendrick
Defendant:
State Of Florida and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Michael Kendrick v. Cory Faircloth, et al
as 10-10845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY KENDRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
CORY FAIRCLOTH, in his individual capacity, DAVID GEE, in his individual capacity and NITIKA JENNINGS, in her individual capacity
Barnes et al v. Pilgrim International, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07101
Defendant:
Pilgrim International, Inc., Sentry Insurance, Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Henrietta Barnes, Henrietta Barnes, Henrietta Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kendrick v. Mathews et al
as 8:2009cv01306
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Kendrick
Defendant:
Richard Mathews, Linda Mitchell and Hillsborough County State Attorneys Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick v. Faircloth et al
as 8:2008cv01892
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Kendrick
Defendant:
Cory Faircloth, David Gee, David Gee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kendrick v. Faircloth et al
as 8:2008cv01686
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Kendrick
Defendant:
Cory Faircloth, David Gee, David Gee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
