Cases 1 - 10 of 96
JOHNSON v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LAMAR JOHNSON
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kitchens v. Wells et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kitchens and Anthony Lamar Kitchens
Defendant:
Ms. Wells, Ms. Ventson, Ms. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCWHITE v. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2022cv01497
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LAMAR MCWHITE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSHUA SHAPIRO, KEVIN RANSOM and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2022cv00938
Defendant:
Anthony Lamar Simmons and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lamar v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamar
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Walker v. Ragazino
as 1:2021cv04485
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lamar Walker, II
Defendant:
Dr. Eric Ragazino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IVEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54520
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LAMAR IVEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILSON v. INCH
as 3:2021cv00988
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LAMAR WILSON, JR
Respondent:
MARK INCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DYE v. USA
as 7:2021cv00078
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LAMAR DYE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SEALS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15882
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LAMAR SEALS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
