Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Anthony Hill v. State of Montana, et al
as 22-35115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY LEVI HILL
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MONTANA and GALLATIN COUNTY JAIL
Hill v. Officer Green et al
as 2:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
Anthony Levi Hill
Defendant:
Officer Green, Officer Musson, Holly Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2021cv00070
Plaintiff:
Anthony Levi Hill
Defendant:
State of Montana and Gallatin County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Wiedimen et al
as 2:2021cv01177
Plaintiff:
Anthony Levi Nelson
Defendant:
Steven P. Bethard, Matthew T. Wiedimen and Darci Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv58416
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEVI TAYLOR JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEVIS et al v. RATNER COMPANIES et al
as 3:2019cv13774
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Hair Cuttery Hamilton Marketplace, JDN Real Estate c/o Property Tax and others
Plaintiff:
Ms Judith Levis, ANTHONY LEVIS and JUDITH LEVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Levi v. Kanthilal
as 3:2014cv03130
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anthony Levi
Defendant:
Sembu K Kanthilal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levi v. Clayton et al
as 3:2013cv03402
Plaintiff:
Ronald Anthony Levi
Defendant:
James Christopher Clayton, Dale Kunkel, Lisa Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levi v. Comcast Holdings Corporation
as 3:2013cv05604
Plaintiff:
Anthony Levi
Defendant:
Comcast Holdings Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEVIS v. LANGLEY et al
as 1:2013cv06847
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEVIS
Defendant:
DAVID J. LANGLEY , JAC MEDI TRANDPORT , ABC, INC. (1-5) and others
Cross_claimant:
JAC MEDI TRANDPORT and DAVID J. LANGLEY
Cross_defendant:
ABC, INC. (1-5) and JOHN AND JANE DOES (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
