Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Roderick v. USA
as 3:2023cv00688
Petitioner:
Donald Anthony Roderick
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HAVENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12793
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RODERICK HAVENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sutton v. Van Leeuwen, et al
as 17-1077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA LAMONT SUTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW VAN LEEUWEN, BRIAN GOWIN, ANTHONY RODERICK and others
Sutton v. Van Leeuwen, et al
as 16-1211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSHUA LAMONT SUTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW VAN LEEUWEN and BRIAN GOWIN
Defendant:
ANTHONY RODERICK and FRAN LAPAGE
Phillip v. Tripp
as 5:2014hc02247
Petitioner:
Anthony Roderick Phillip
Respondent:
Brick Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sutton v. VanLeeuwen et al
as 1:2014cv02379
Defendant:
Remax Incorporated, Social Security Administration, The, Anthony Roderick and others
Plaintiff:
Isha Roberts, Joshua Lamont Sutton and Joshua Sutton
Petitioner:
Thomas Bradford Flesher, J. Murray, Larry Charles Schwartz and others
Interested Party:
Case Manager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Phillip v. GEO Group, Incorporated
as 12-8004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY RODERICK PHILLIP
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, GEORGE E. SNYDER, W. BRANCH and others
Phillip v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012ct03168
Plaintiff:
Anthony Roderick Phillip
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Anthony Phillip
as 10-6511
Movant:
ANTHONY RODERICK PHILLIP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Phillip v. GEO Group, Inc et al
as 5:2009ct03115
Plaintiff:
Anthony Roderick Phillip
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc, George E. Snyder, W. Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
