Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Anthony Grimes v. Tim Lane
as 24-5456
Petitioner:
ANTHONY THOMAS GRIMES
Respondent:
TIM LANE, Warden
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Muthana et al v. DeAngelo et al
as 2:2023cv12255
Plaintiff:
Ali Musaid Muthana, Mikel Smith, Joshua Paradien and others
Defendant:
Jodi L DeAngelo, Zarie Phillips, J. Gonzalez and others
Petrey et al v. City of Wilmington et al
as 1:2023cv00490
Plaintiff:
William Darrell Petrey and Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
City of Wilmington, Mark McKay and Ronald Fithen
Interested Party:
Dave Yost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Violante v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv11179
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas Violante
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Arbor Professional Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00605
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas Lott, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sheridan v. Ambassador ARms Apartments
as 2:2022cv12090
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas Sheridan
Defendant:
Ambassador Arms Apartments
Harrelson v. BOP Director
as 0:2022cv00038
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas Harrelson
Respondent:
BOP Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DeLong v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00493
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas DeLong
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas #476165 v. MaCauley
as 1:2021cv00118
Respondent:
Matt MaCauley
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Thomas #476165
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
