Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Ojeda (Davila)
as 21-1108
Defendant:
Samuel Palmer, AKA Junior, Calvin Ojeda, AKA Killa, Dwight Anderson, AKA Munda and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Louis Davila, AKA Bam, AKA Bam Bam
Appellee:
United States of America
United States of America v. Ojeda (Davila)
as 21-1106
Defendant:
Samuel Palmer, AKA Junior, Calvin Ojeda, AKA Killa, Dwight Anderson, AKA Munda and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Louis Davila, AKA Bam, AKA Bam Bam
Appellee:
United States of America
HENDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04344
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Rafael Ojeda (Anderson)
as 18-1839
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rafael Ojeda, AKA Papi, Calvin Ojeda, AKA Killa, Jonathan Ojeda, AKA Shorty, AKA Chorty and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Dwight Anderson, AKA Munda
Eric Henderson v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-11086
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERIC ANTOINE HENDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Henderson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2013cv00055
Petitioner:
Eric Antoine Henderson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2013cv00328
Petitioner:
Eric Antoine Henderson
Respondent:
William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv13713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Metcalf v. AutoZone, Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv03669
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Michael Metcalf
Defendant:
AutoZone, Inc. and Antoine Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
