Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Marks v. Walgreens Store 3518 et al
as 2:2010cv03100
Plaintiff:
Antolin Andrew Marks
Defendant:
Walgreens Store 3518, Melinda Miner, Joanne Coates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marks v. British Petroleum et al
as 2:2010cv02975
Plaintiff:
Antolin Andrew Marks
Defendant:
British Petroleum, Tony Hayward and Bryan Grote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marks v. Reliant Financial et al
as 3:2010cv01721
Plaintiff:
Antolin Andrew Marks
Defendant:
Reliant Financial and Auburn Way Motors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marks v. British Petroleum et al
as 3:2010cv02884
Plaintiff:
Antolin Andrew Marks
Defendant:
British Petroleum, Tony Hayward and Bryan Grote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marks v. Alexander et al
as 3:2010cv02666
Plaintiff:
Antolin Andrew Marks
Defendant:
C. Alexander, Bill Rhoads, Eric Hamry and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marks v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 4:2009cv06043
Plaintiff:
Antolin Andrew Marks
Defendant:
Sprint Corporation, Nextel Corporation and Boost Mobile Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Marks v. Sprint Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv06043
Plaintiff:
Antolin Andrew Marks
Defendant:
Sprint Corporation, Nextel Corporation and Boost Mobile Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
MARKS v. DOES et al
as 3:2009cv05489
Plaintiff:
Antolin Andrew Marks
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF GEO GROUP, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05028
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
