Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Fernandez v. Unicorn Wealth LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Antonio Fernandez
Defendant:
Unicorn Wealth LLC and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Rust v. Fernandez, et al.
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
CLARK RUST, independently, and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
ANTONIO FERNANDEZ, Sgt., ROBERT HOLDEN, C.O., AUBRIE MILLER and others
FERNANDEZ et al
as 2:2022cv01617
Plaintiff:
JUAN ANTONIO FERNANDEZ and MARTINEZ MINI MARKET 2, Inc.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 202
MCLAUGHLIN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2021cv02834
Plaintiff:
TARAH MCLAUGHLIN, M.M., E.M. and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Antonio Fernandez v. Roberta Torres, et al
as 20-55723
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERTA A. TORRES and CBC RESTAURANT CORP., a Delaware Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO FERNANDEZ
Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A. v. Jorge Garcia
as 20-1689
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI S.P.A., AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI AMERICA, LLC and VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
ANTHONY CRUDUP, ROBERT BRANER and LAMBORGHINI LATINO AMERICA USA
Defendant / Appellant:
JORGE ANTONIO FERNANDEZ-GARCIA
Yonchuk v. Liberty Property Trust et al
as 1:2020cv00033
Defendant:
Dennis W. Deloach, Daniel P. Garton, Katherine E. Dietze and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Yonchuk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garfield v. Hankowsky et al
as 1:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Katherine Dietze, Antonio Fernandez, Prologis, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Garfield
Hagerty v. Liberty Property Trust et al
as 1:2019cv11679
Defendant:
Katherine Dietze, Daniel P. Garton, Fredric J. Tomczyk and others
Plaintiff:
Royal Hagerty
MCDONOUGH v. LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST et al
as 2:2019cv21582
Defendant:
KATHERINE DIETZE, DANIEL P. GARTON, ROBERT G. GIFFORD and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MCDONOUGH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
