Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Portillo-Tellez v. Garland
as 24-967
Petitioner:
DAYSI YULESI PORTILLO-TELLEZ, OSMAN ANTONIO ORTEGA-PORTILLO and YORDANY RUBEN PORTILLO-TELLEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ortega Garcia et al v. HWH, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv02891
Plaintiff:
Maurino Antonio Ortega Garcia, Consuelo De Los Angeles Navarrete and Karla Dolores Barahona Navarrete
Defendant:
HWH, LLC doing business as Happy Wash and James J. Pak
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ortega v. The Matilda Gourmet Deli Inc et al
as 1:2021cv10212
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Ortega
Defendant:
The Matilda Gourmet Deli Inc, De Reimer Food Corp., Nereid Gourmet Deli Inc and others
Gonzalez et al v. Ninth Ave. Kitchen Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv01158
Defendant:
Amnard Bhuviriyakul, Boyythai Corp., Peter Kwanchaipruck and others
Plaintiff:
Quirino Ortega Gonzalez, Antonio Ortega Gonzalez and Cruz Mejia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Antonio Ortega-Teotlale
as 20-50286
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO ORTEGA-TEOTLALE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ORTEGA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv42634
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO ANTONIO ORTEGA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Doe v. School City of Hammond et al
as 2:2017cv00402
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
School City of Hammond , Robert Wilson , Dr Walter Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
