Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16960
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO RAMIREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAMIREZ JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12257
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO ANTONIO RAMIREZ JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramirez v. Ramirez
as 1:2023cv13903
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Lucido Ramirez
Defendant:
Juan Antonio Ramirez and Juan Antonio Ramirez doing business as Rio Bravo Laundromat
Ramirez v. Walmart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Antonio Ramirez
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP and Rollin Beauperthuy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Argumedo De Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-427
Petitioner:
SANDRA ELIZABETH ARGUMEDO DE RAMIREZ, ANDERSON ANTONIO RAMIREZ ARGUMEDO and KAREN LISETTE RAMIREZ ARGUMEDO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez v. Thornell et al
as 4:2023cv00114
Petitioner:
Jorge Antonio Ramirez
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAMIREZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO RAMIREZ, JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shinaul v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv07287
Plaintiff:
Davante Shinaul
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Gabriel Navarro, Antonio Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
