Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Gardener v. Marsh et al
as 3:2024cv01784
Defendant:
Sarah Fasano, Angel Quiros, Antonio Santiago and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gardener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Baltas v. Snyder et al
as 3:2024cv01487
Defendant:
Terrance O'Neill, William Mulligan, Jaclyn Osden and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03606
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lawrence v. Zack et al
as 3:2024cv01142
Defendant:
Bowers, Antonio Santiago, Zack and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarol Santiago v. Ursula Wynn
as 23-13883
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAROL ANTONIO SANTIAGO
Defendant / Appellee:
URSULA WYNN
Fraser v. Caribe
as 23-6617
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIMAR FRASER
Defendant / Appellee:
NORBERTO CARIBE, II and ANTONIO SANTIAGO
Santiago v. Acting Commissioner Social Security
as 1:2023cv23426
Plaintiff:
Antonio Santiago
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Acting Commissioner Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SANTIAGO RESTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14007
Plaintiff:
LUIS ANTONIO SANTIAGO RESTO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10263
Plaintiff:
JOSE ANTONIO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SANTIAGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00294
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
