Patent Cases between January 1, 2013 and May 26, 2018
Cases 71 - 80 of 305
Nokia Technologies Oy et al v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2016cv01441
Plaintiff: Nokia Technologies Oy and Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc.
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC v. Apple Inc
as 2:2016cv01098
Consol_plaintiff: Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC
Defendant: Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Andrea Electronics Corporation v. Apple Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv05220
Plaintiff: Andrea Electronics Corporation
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nissim Corp. v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2016cv23841
Plaintiff: Nissim Corp.
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co, Ltd, et al
as 16-2075
Plaintiff - Appellee: TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
Defendant - Appellant: EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO, LTD and EVERLIGHT AMERICAS, INC.
Defendant: EPISTAR CORPORATION, LITE-ON INC., LITE-ON SERVICE USA, INC. and others
Interested Party: HUNG-CHIH YANG, HSIN-YUAN HUANG, BORDER GROUP and others
511 Innovations, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00868
Plaintiff: 511 Innovations, Inc.
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Somaltus, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00758
Plaintiff: Somaltus, LLC
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Lit v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2016cv07048
Plaintiff: Samuel Lit
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2016cv03582
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Plaintiff: Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Special Master: Matthew Borden
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv03582
Plaintiff: Straight Path IP Group, Inc.
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?