Cases 151 - 160 of 167
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00852
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Employment Discrimination
Acosta et al v. Apple, Inc et al
as 5:2011cv04207
Plaintiff:
Natasha Acosta and Dolma Acevedo-Crespo
Defendant:
Apple, Inc, GogII, Inc, Pandora Media, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: M 22-1 Designation by U.S. Attorney of individual to accept service of summons and complaint
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv02509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv02509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnston et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2011cv03321
Plaintiff:
Brian Johnston and Nile Charles
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Omniscient Investigation Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Acosta et al v. Apple, Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01326
Plaintiff:
Natasha Acosta and Dolma Acevedo-Crespo
Defendant:
Apple, Inc, GOGII, Inc, Pandora Media, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
