Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Shekhovtsov v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2024cv02311
Plaintiff:
Stanislav Shekhovtsov
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Shekhovtsov v. Apple Inc.
as 2:2024cv02095
Plaintiff:
Stanislav Shekhovtsov
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Windless v. Avergis et al
as 2:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
Demetra Elaine Windless
Defendant:
Doctor John Avergis, Doctor Mary Keegan, Lisa Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
5G Corporation et al v. Sprint Communications Company L.P. et al
as 2:2021cv02350
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk W. Aaron Hall
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, Apple Inc., Sprint Communications Company L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
5G Corporation and Amelia Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Boileau et al v. Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00139
Defendant:
Sarah O'Connell, Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Thomas Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Tangredi Boileau and Kyle Joseph Boileau
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Viglietti v. Apple, Inc
as 2:2020cv02773
Defendant:
Apple, Inc
Plaintiff:
Rico Viglietti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fontana v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00019
Plaintiff:
Anthony "Tony" Fontana
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Verizon Wireless Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Wesley R. Thomas
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Austin Peay State University-Board of Trustees, Brookdale Clarksville and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
