Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Smith v. Ballys Shreveport Casino & Hotel et al
as 5:2026cv00844
Plaintiff:
April Smith
Defendant:
Schindler Elevator Corp, Premier Entertainment Shreveport L L C and Ballys Shreveport Casino & Hotel
Cross-Complainant:
Premier Entertainment Shreveport L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SMITH v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv01699
Petitioner:
APRIL SMITH
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv01101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith v. Townsend Foods, Inc. et al
as 4:2025cv00008
Plaintiff:
April Smith
Defendant:
Townsend Foods, Inc. and Bill Townsend
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv01515
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
April Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
April Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
