Cases 71 - 80 of 288
Hopp v. Kane County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv01110
Plaintiff:
Ryan Lee Hopp
Defendant:
Kane County Jail, Aramark Director, Lieutenant Conklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Kramer et al
as 1:2018cv00499
Plaintiff:
Isaac Norman Bowman
Defendant:
Kramer, B Woods, Conklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds v. Aramark, et. al. et al
as 4:2018cv04001
Plaintiff:
Matt Edmonds
Defendant:
Aramark, et. al. and Steve Dredge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cintron v. Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv08845
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cintron
Defendant:
Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services, LLC and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Labor One, Inc. v. Staff Management Solutions, LLC, et l
as 1:2017cv07580
Plaintiff:
Labor One, Inc.
Defendant:
Staff Management Solutions, LLC , Aramark Services, Inc. and Aramark Food and Support Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McBride v. Lewis et al
as 1:2017cv07501
Plaintiff:
Robert Travon McBride
Defendant:
Chris Lewis, Donald Kramer, Aramark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guzman v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC
as 1:2017cv06556
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Guzman
Defendant:
Aramark Educational Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Shanks v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04249
Plaintiff:
David Shanks
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06178
Plaintiff:
George Brown
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. , Aramark Facility Services, LLC , Aramark Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
LaRue v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04236
Plaintiff:
Johnny LaRue
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
