Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tornquist v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2023cv04195
Plaintiff:
Matthew Tornquist
Defendant:
State of South Dakota, County of Minnehaha, City of Sioux Falls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv02897
Plaintiff:
Enrico E.M. Brown
Defendant:
Col. Jerome Smith, Prince George's County Department of Corrections, Director Cornne Labbe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LaRue v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04236
Plaintiff:
Johnny LaRue
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04206
Plaintiff:
Robert Bethel
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hansen v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04189
Plaintiff:
Michael Hansen
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wegrzyn v. Saint Lucie County et al
as 2:2015cv14155
Plaintiff:
Michael Darin Wegrzyn
Defendant:
Saint Lucie County, Aramark Correctional Food Service, Inc., Corizion Correctional Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wegrzyn v. Saint Lucie County et al
as 6:2015cv00618
Plaintiff:
Michael Darin Wegrzyn
Defendant:
Saint Lucie County, Aramark Correctional Food Service, Inc., Corizion Correctional Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wegrzyn v. Saint Lucie County et al
as 2:2015cv14132
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Wegrzyn
Defendant:
Saint Lucie County, Aramark Correctional Food Service, Inc., Corizion Correctional Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wegrzyn v. Saint Lucie County et al
as 6:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Wegrzyn
Defendant:
Saint Lucie County, Aramark Correctional Food Service, Inc., Corizion Correctional Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
