Cases 31 - 40 of 179
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ABDELHADY v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2022cv01334
Plaintiff:
HDEEL ABDELHADY
Defendant:
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, PMA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and ARAMARK SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Samartino v. Aramark Facility Services, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01307
Plaintiff:
Lynn Samartino
Defendant:
Aramark Facility Services, LLC, Aramark Services, Inc. and Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Kelly v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01272
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Kelly and Lawrence Kelly, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Kelly v. Aramark Services Inc
as 3:2022mc80057
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Kelly and Lawrence Kelly, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Services Inc
Robles v. L3Harris Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Rafael Robles
Defendant:
L3Harris Technologies, Inc., L3 Technologies, Inc., Aramark Services, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Billups-Larkin v. Aramark Services, Inc.
as 3:2021cv06852
Plaintiff:
Tiara Billups-Larkin
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pedroza v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04419
Plaintiff:
Josephine Pedroza
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Business & Industry, LLC, Aramark Business Facilities, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bush v. Aramark Services Inc
as 7:2021cv00829
Plaintiff:
Atasha Bush
Defendant:
Aramark Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
