Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Jackson, et al v. Los Lunas Community Program, et al
as 16-2172
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WALTER STEPHEN JACKSON, by his parents and next friends, Walter and Helen Jackson, STEVE NUNEZ, by his guardian and next friend, Mary Kathryn Reed, RON FULLER, by his mother and next friend, Josephine Boughton and others
Plaintiff Intervenor - Appellee:
JOHN E. YOUNG, IRIS YOUNG, legal guardians and paren of Rita Kay Young, DORA L. ROMERO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Valencia Green v. Bill Matrayek Trust et al
as 5:2016cv00763
Defendant:
Ladeena Arguello, Bill Matrayek Trust, Cannon Management and others
Plaintiff:
Valencia Green
CHIN et al v. ARMSTRONG et al
as 4:2015cv00399
Plaintiff:
KARI L CHIN , DEBORAH E CHIN , ALMA A VEZQUEZ and others
Defendant:
JOHN H ARMSTRONG and KENNETH JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kenneth Smith v. Antonin Scalia, et al
as 14-5180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth L. Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, John G. Roberts and others
Arguello v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2014cv01602
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Arguello
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv20738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. REECE et al
as 1:2013cv01610
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. SMITH
Defendant:
DEANELLE TACHA REECE, ANTONIN G. SCALIA, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
