Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Arjo Inc. v. KPC Healthcare, Inc.
as 8:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
Arjo Inc.
Defendant:
KPC Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sean Ardinazo v. Arjo Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02836
Plaintiff:
Sean Ardinazo
Defendant:
Arjo Inc., Does 1 to 100 and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Efrain Perez v. Arjo Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00957
Plaintiff:
Efrain Perez
Defendant:
Arjo Inc., Arjo Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as Arjohuntleigh Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arjo Inc. et al v. Turn Medical, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv01173
Plaintiff:
ARJO, INC. and Arjo Inc..
Counter Defendant:
HUNTLEIGH TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
Counter Plaintiff:
TURN MEDICAL, LLC, Eric Barta, Chris Niederkrom and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Arjo Inc. v. Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center et al
as 1:2021cv03185
Defendant:
Rutland Nursing Home, Inc. and Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Arjo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Arjo Inc. v. Arjo-Century Distributing, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05000
Defendant:
Arjo-Century Distributing, Inc. and Karman D. Cusack
Plaintiff:
Arjo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Arjo Inc v. Handicare USA, Inc et al
as 1:2018cv02554
Plaintiff:
Arjo Inc
Defendant:
Handicare USA, Inc , Handicare Denver, Arjo-Century Distributing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
D T Davis Enterprises v. Arjo Inc
as 13-4289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
D T DAVIS ENTERPRISES, LTD., DBA Hovertech International
Defendant - Appellee:
ARJO INC
D.T. DAVIS ENTERPRISES, LTD. v. ARJO, INC.
as 5:2012cv01374
Plaintiff:
D.T. DAVIS ENTERPRISES, LTD.
Defendant:
ARJO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
