Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Smith v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 8:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Arlene Smith
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Neely
as 7:2022cv01576
Petitioner:
Tracy Arlene Smith
Respondent:
Warden Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Neely
as 7:2022cv00929
Petitioner:
Tracy Arlene Smith
Respondent:
Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tracy Smith v. United States
as 22-2264
Petitioner:
Tracy Arlene Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Tracy Smith v. United States
as 21-2735
Petitioner:
Tracy Arlene Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Tracy Smith v. United States
as 21-2256
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tracy Arlene Smith
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Tonya Chapman v. Oakland Living Center, Inc.
as 20-2361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONYA R. CHAPMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE SMITH, OAKLAND LIVING CENTER, INCORPORATED, MICHAEL SMITH and others
Smith v. USA
as 3:2020cv05092
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tracy Arlene Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Arlen Smith, et al v. Colette Peters, et al
as 20-35385
Defendant / Appellee:
ANITA NELSON, Administrator and Manager of Commissary Operations, Oregon Department of Corrections, MIKE GOWERS, Assistant Director, Oregon Department of Corrections, COLETTE S. PETERS, Director, Oregon Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARLEN SMITH, ROTISH SINGH, ex. rel United States of America; on behalf of themself and on behalf of all others similarly situated and JERRY HARRYMAN
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Doherty et al v. Kopelowitz Ostrow, P.A. et al
as 1:2019cv05824
Plaintiff:
Sonny and Seema Kapila, James Booth, Michael Krage and others
Defendant:
Andrew Dale Ledbetter and Kopelowitz Ostrow, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
