Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Laws v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Steven J Laws
Defendant:
Cocke County, Tennessee, Armando Fontes, Joshua R Hartsell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wolfe et al v. Fontes et al
as 2:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Roger Wolfe and Melissa Sisk
Defendant:
Armando Fontes, Bob Schaff, Josh Hartsell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Cocke County et al
as 2:2021cv00004
Defendant:
Jessica Huff, Armando Fontes, Josh Hartsell and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dexter Manning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manning v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Jessica Huff, Armando Fontes, Josh Hartsell and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dexter Manning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reynolds v. Cocke County et al
as 2:2020cv00177
Defendant:
Lt Rae Edison, Sgt Mark Keiser, Lt Stephen Revill and others
Plaintiff:
Virgil Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Click vs. Cocke County, Tennessee et al (RLJ2)
as 2:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Eric Allen Click and Jay Lee Jones
Defendant:
Cocke County, Armando Fontes, Jason Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hance v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
Rodney Aaron Hance
Defendant:
Cocke County, Tennessee and Armando Fontes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgin v. Cocke County et al (JRG3)
as 2:2017cv00173
Plaintiff:
Myra Burgin
Defendant:
Cocke County, Armando Fontes, Tommy Large and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al (JRG2)
as 2:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
Charles Mason, Jr.
Defendant:
Cocke County, Tennessee , Armando Fontes , Tommy Large and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grooms v. Young et al
as 2:2015cv00191
Defendant:
Joe Young, Clint Sonnier, Miriam and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Grooms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
