Cases 41 - 50 of 151
Joanne Blight v. City of Manteca, et al
as 17-17334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOANNE BLIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MANTECA, a municipal corporation, ARMANDO GARCIA, Manteca Police Department Detective, IAN OSBORN, Manteca Police Department Detective and others
Aceves et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv06078
Plaintiff:
Jenna Aceves , Juan Alas , Ron Alcalay and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. and Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Daniel Barbosa, et al v. DHS, et al
as 17-5206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Barbosa, Luis Barbosa, Ramon Bueno and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Homeland Security and Federal Emergency Management Agency
USA v. Alejandro Garcia-Araiza
as 17-50717
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALEJANDRO GARCIA-ARAIZA, also known as Armando Garcia-Vera
Garcia v. Arnold
as 2:2017cv01483
Petitioner:
Armando Garcia
Respondent:
E. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harvey et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2017cv03750
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Harvey , Donald Raper , Patricia Raper and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oscar Garcia v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71626
Petitioner:
OSCAR ARMANDO GARCIA
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Harvey et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2017cv01107
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Harvey , Donald Raper , Patricia Raper and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armando Garcia v. Jeffery Beard
as 17-55020
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARMANDO GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFERY BEARD, Director of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
