Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Moss v. State of Alabama, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv00766
Plaintiff:
Cesar Moss
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Department of Corrections, Richard F. Allen, Arnold Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Burgess v. Allen et al
as 1:2009cv00372
Plaintiff:
Russell Burgess
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Arnold Holt and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barksdale v. Holt et al
as 2:2008cv00441
Plaintiff:
Mary Barksdale, Mary Barksdale and Mary Barksdale
Defendant:
Arnold Holt, Michael Robbins and Joseph McGinn
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dilworth v. Holt et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv01060
Plaintiff:
Marcus C. Dilworth
Defendant:
Arnold Holt, Richard Allen and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Holt et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2007cv00884
Plaintiff:
Joe Benoit Martin
Defendant:
Arnold Holt, L. Bolling, M. A. Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bagley v. Holt et al
as 4:2007cv01786
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bagley
Defendant:
Arnold Holt and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bagley v. Holt et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2007cv00802
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bagley
Defendant:
Arnold Holt and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puckett v. Pettway et al (MAG+)
as 2:2007cv00636
Plaintiff:
David Cicero Puckett
Defendant:
Jackie Pettway, Arnold Holt and W. J. Giles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Coleman v. Holt et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00534
Plaintiff:
Elijah Coleman
Defendant:
Arnold Holt, Kenneth L. Jones and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
