Cases 1 - 10 of 494
Pamatz Valencia, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2658
Plaintiff:
LEONILA ROSARIO PAMATZ VALENCIA and JOSE BELEN RECENDIZ ARREOLA
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Ransome Ndi Nfor v. City of Perris et al
as 5:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Ransome Ndi Nfor
Defendant:
City of Perris, County of Riverside, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, A MUNICIPAL ENTITY et al v. City of Perris et al
as 2:2024cv02983
Plaintiff:
Ransome Ndi Nfor
Petitioner:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, A MUNICIPAL ENTITY
Defendant:
City of Perris, Michael Anthony Arreola and State Of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nfor v. County of Riverside et al
as 2:2024cv02985
Plaintiff:
Ransome Ndi Nfor
Defendant:
County of Riverside, City of Perris, Michael Anthony Arreola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Brown, et al.
as 24-2237
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. TURNER and Anthony Richardo Turner
Defendant:
EDMOND G. BROWN, JR., SCOTT KERNAN, MATTHEW CATES and others
Arreola v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Arreola
Defendant:
Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Pina v. Garland
as 24-1942
Petitioner:
JUAN ARREOLA PINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Reed v. Buckel et al
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Mychal Reed
Defendant:
A. Buckel, S. Steadman, T. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Younger v. Officer Alvarez et al
as 1:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Brandi Adrienne Younger
Defendant:
Alvarez, Gonzales, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
