Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Peoples v. Charlotte-Meck Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
William Henry Peoples, lll
Defendant:
Charlotte-Meck Police Department, Public Defenders Office, State of North Carolina Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. Arron et al
as 3:2019cv00019
Plaintiff:
Duane L. Fox and Jennifer Ann Jasmaine
Defendant:
FNU Germaney, FNU Hatley and FNU Arron
Syska v. Harrison et al Do not docket in this case.
as 5:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
Arron Syska
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison, Obinnaya C Umesi, Angela Bethea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Syska v. Harrison et al
as 5:2017ct03115
Plaintiff:
Arron Syska
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison , Obinnaya C. Umesi, M.D., Angela Bethea, PA-C and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosby v. Harper et al
as 5:2015ct03233
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mosby
Defendant:
Julie Harper, Arron Johnson, George T. Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peggs v. Brian Shipwash & Surety Insurance Company et al
as 3:2015cv00278
Plaintiff:
James Ronald Peggs
Defendant:
Brian Shipwash & Surety Insurance Company, David Wilson & Rossabi Black Slaughter, P.A. , Arron B. Anderson Trustee Service of Carolina LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS v. FEDERAL MEDIAL CENTER et al
as 1:2014cv00707
Plaintiff:
ARDELL L. JENKINS
Defendant:
FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, WARDEN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2014cv00203
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Dieshawn Chandler
Defendant:
FNU Mitchell, FNU Mims and David Arron
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00190
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McNeil v. Whaley
as 5:2011hc02152
Petitioner:
Arron Larry McNeil
Defendant:
Lawrence Whaley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
