Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Wayne Jordan v. Thomas Seltzer
as 23-7079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE ARTHUR JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS SELTZER, WALTER WEST, VANESSA ANDERSON, Case Management-Classification ECI and others
Jordan et al v. Maxwood Furniture, Inc.
as 0:2023cv60786
Plaintiff:
Ronald Arthur Jordan and Heather Eileen Jordan
Defendant:
Maxwood Furniture, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jordan v. Bivens et al
as 1:2022cv00919
Petitioner:
Wayne Arthur Jordan
Respondent:
Carlos Bivens and The Attorney General For The State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Bivens et al
as 1:2022cv00611
Petitioner:
Wayne Arthur Jordan
Respondent:
Warden Carlos Bivens and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Seltzer et al
as 1:2021cv03048
Plaintiff:
Wayne Arthur Jordan
Defendant:
Tom Seltzer, West, Vanessa Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jordan v. Warden Bivens et al
as 1:2021cv02934
Plaintiff:
Wayne Arthur Jordan
Defendant:
Warden Bivens, Warden Weber, Dr. Choudry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JORDAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16202
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JORDAN v. EASTERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv00034
Defendant:
EASTERN MAINE MEDICAL CENTER and DR JAMES CLARKE
Plaintiff:
BURT ARTHUR JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JORDAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56398
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JORDAN et al v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2017cv12934
Plaintiff:
JILL JORDAN and ARTHUR JORDAN
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.