Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Arrington v. Smith et al
as 3:2013cv01080
Plaintiff:
Thermon Arrington
Defendant:
Arthur Smith and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arrington v. Smith et al
as 4:2012cv00156
Plaintiff:
Thermon Arrington
Defendant:
Arthur Smith and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Howerton
as 2:2012cv00399
Petitioner:
George Arthur Smith
Respondent:
Tony Howerton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrington v. Smith et al
as 4:2012cv00085
Petitioner:
Thermon Arrington
Respondent:
Arthur Smith and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Mack Smith
as 12-30693
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MACK ARTHUR SMITH
Barrett et al v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2012cv03095
Plaintiff:
Donnie Barrett, Michael Halbrook, Kenneth Seidler and others
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Human Services, Forrest Ashby, Reggy Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smego et al v. Ashby et al
as 3:2011cv03395
Plaintiff:
Richard M Smego, Jeremy Schloss, Charles Brand and others
Defendant:
Forrest J Ashby, James Clayton, Marie Durant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. USA
as 3:2011cv00719
Petitioner:
Mack Arthur Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Schloss et al v. Ashby et al
as 3:2011cv03337
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Schloss, Ronald Levi, Don Evans and others
Defendant:
Forest Ashby, Alfreda Kibby, Larry J Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Aramark Food Services Corp et al
as 3:2011cv03237
Plaintiff:
Arthur Smith
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services Corp, Alfreda Kibby, Steve Dredge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
