Cases 1 - 10 of 10
SANDOVAL VEGA v. SOLID PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01762
Plaintiff:
ARTURO SANDOVAL VEGA
Defendant:
SOLID PROPERTIES, LLC, OAK PARK APARTMENTS, LLC, 1835-1837 GOOD HOPE ROAD, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes, et al
as 22-55496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINE SAWICKY
Defendant / Appellee:
TAO SYKES, Manuel Real Beneficiary, PERCY ANDERSON, PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ and others
Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes et al
as 2:2021cv09023
Plaintiff:
Christine Sawicky
Defendant:
Tao Sykes, Percy Anderson, Philip S. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
USA v. Carlos Sandoval
as 15-20598
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CARLOS ARTURO SANDOVAL, also known as Jose Ricardo Zuniga Quintero
Western World Insurance Company v. Saucedo et al
as 2:2013cv00827
Plaintiff:
Western World Insurance Company
Defendant:
Arturo Sandoval Saucedo, Jesus Saucedo Sandoval, J&A Construction Siding LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Arturo Sandoval v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-72012
Petitioner:
ARTURO SANDOVAL
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Arturo Sandoval v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-70940
Petitioner:
ARTURO SANDOVAL
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Art Impressions, Inc. v. Friends & Friends, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv06629
Plaintiff:
Art Impressions, Inc. and Art Impressions, Inc.
Defendant:
Friends & Friends, Inc., Friends & Friends, Inc., Samuel Borkson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
USA v. Sandoval
as 08-10580
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARTURO SANDOVAL, JR.
Cornell v. Canarecci Jr et al
as 3:2007cv00574
Estate Plaintiff:
Gregory Brian Cornell
Defendant:
Sheriff Frank Canarecci Jr, Sargent R Olmstead, Chief Botich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
