Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Arzola v. ALDI, Inc.
as 1:2023cv16659
Plaintiff:
Kelley Y. Arzola
Defendant:
ALDI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ramirez-Lizardi et al v. Mennonite General Hospital Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Ramirez-Lizardi and Lucila Rodriguez-Cruz
Defendant:
Mennonite General Hospital Inc., Hospital Menonita Caguas, Inc., Sistema de Salud Menonita and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
SPIVEY v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK, CPT JOE ARZOLA, SGT JACK MASTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPIVEY v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK, CPT JOE ARZOLA, SGT JACK MASTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Arzola v. Ortiz et al
as 3:2021cv00367
Plaintiff:
Richard Arzola
Defendant:
Bart Ortiz, Nathaniel Bradford and Elko Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Arzola v. Robles, et al.
as 1:2020cv00816
Defendant:
City of Woodlake and Oscar Robles
Plaintiff:
Alejandra Arzola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amato et al v. McGinty et al
as 1:2017cv00593
Plaintiff:
Frances Amato, John Doe, Adrienne Auchmoody and others
Defendant:
Anthony McGinty , Andrew Gilday , Amy Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
