Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Samantha Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04956
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley, James Kern and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Brandon et al v. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, et al
as 4:2022cv00635
Plaintiff:
Wanda Brandon, Andrew Craig, Alice Crockett and others
Defendant:
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, Kelvin R. Adams, Charles K. Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00759
Plaintiff:
Jones, Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00759
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley, James Kern and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gogel, et al v. Smith, et al
as 3:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Gilbrith Gogel, Puranjyot Chaggar, Ashanti Holland and others
Defendant:
William Smith, Antoinette V. Irving, E. M. Konopka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Khamani Lodge
as 22-10361
Petitioner:
In re: KHAMANI LODGE
Respondent:
RICK HALE, TOYA STEVENSON, KATRANA LUELLEN and others
In re: Khamani Lodge
as 22-10360
Petitioner:
In re: KHAMANI LODGE
Respondent:
RICK HALE, TOYA STEVENSON, KATRANA LUELLEN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
