Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Melodee White v. The Dow Chemical Company
as 08-1165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELODEE WHITE, Administratrix of the Estate of John H. White, deceased, individually and as next friend and guardian of M. W., an infant under the age of eighteen
Defendant - Appellee:
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, a foreign corporation and DOW AGROSCIENCES L.L.C., a foreign corporation
Defendant - None:
JOHN DOE HERBICIDE AND CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, JOHN DOE HERBICIDE AND CHEMICAL DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Asplundh, a foreign corporation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv05221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv02009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Gambrell v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company Health Benefit and Premium Payment Plan et al
as 8:2007cv03412
Plaintiff:
Ronnie S Gambrell and Ronnie S Gambrell
Defendant:
Asplundh Tree Expert Company Health Benefit and Premium Payment Plan and Asplundh Tree Expert Co
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Osborne v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company
as 2:2007cv00007
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Osborne and Timothy E. Osborne
Defendant:
Asplundh Tree Expert Company and Asplundh Tree Expert Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Solorio, et al v. Asplundh Tree, et al
as 1:2002cv08035
Defendant:
Asplundh Tree Expert Co. , Asplundh Tree Expert Company , Asplundh Manufacturing Division and others
Plaintiff:
Hector Solorio
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Asplundh Tree Expert Co. , Asplundh Tree Expert Company , Asplundh Manufacturing Division and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Samar Tree Service, Inc. and Saul Rueda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
