Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Benton et al v. Asset Acceptance LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00322
Plaintiff:
Joe Benton and Alicia Benton
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance LLC and Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Propst et al v. Asset Acceptance LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00316
Plaintiff:
Joy Propst and Daniel Propst
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance LLC and Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Eads v. Asset Acceptance LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00308
Plaintiff:
Scott Eads
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance LLC and Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. Asset Acceptance, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv50363
Plaintiff:
Brian Williams
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC and Encore Capital Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Asset Acceptance LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jack Allen
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance LLC, A Dickson-Rekasi and Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Doss v. Asset Acceptance LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00217
Plaintiff:
Rebecca W Doss
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance LLC, A Dickson-Rekasi and Fulton, Friedman & Gullace, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lagdameo v. Mel S. Harris, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00929
Plaintiff:
Maria Dolores Lagdameo
Defendant:
Mel S. Harris, LLC, Forster & Garbus, LLP, LR Credit 17, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv13584
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Laugenour v. Asset Acceptance, LLC
as 2:2012cv01704
Plaintiff:
David Laugenour
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Boonsue v. Asset Acceptance LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00081
Plaintiff:
Karrom Boonsue
Defendant:
Asset Acceptance LLC, Lori Zorn and Mendelson Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
