Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Stanwyck v. City of Rhome et al
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Marc Stanwyck
Defendant:
City of Rhome, Eric Debus, Carvan Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Newson v. Douglas et al
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Richard D. Douglas, Robert W. Wedemeyer, Camille R. McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Hopkins
as 24-60058
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Welch Atkins
Defendant:
Patrick Hopkins, in his individual and official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Linn v. Jonnett Product Enterprises et al
as 3:2023cv01301
Plaintiff:
Montreal Linn
Defendant:
Jonnett Product Enterprises, Lakeside Community Committee, Michael D Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Felder v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Kevin Felder
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Mayor of Dallas, Dallas City Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hill v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2022cv01633
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hill and **Sanctioned/Barred* Lisa Hill
Defendant:
City of Shreveport, T Washington, Charlie Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 (DO NOT USE)
Jim's Car Wash et al v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2021cv01746
Plaintiff:
Jim's Car Wash, Freddy Davenport and Dale Davenport
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Chad West, Adam Medrano and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
