Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-3405
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, aka P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS CORP.
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-1310
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, aka P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS CORP.
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean "P. Diddy" Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Emrit v. Combs et al.
as 1:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 2:2024cv10566
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment, Atlantic Records and others
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit and RESTRICTED FILER Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Emrit v Combs, et al
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean "P. Diddy" Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jackson v. Apple et al
as 5:2022cv00928
Plaintiff:
Heaven Jackson
Defendant:
Apple, Verizon, Steak & Shake and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lilly v. Atlantic Records
as 2:2021cv05591
Plaintiff:
Justin Christopher Lilly
Defendant:
Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
dunning v. jefferson et al
as 2:2021cv10670
Defendant:
Atlantic Recording Corporation, warner music group, corp, warner music inc. and others
Plaintiff:
orlandus dunning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
