Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Snead v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Mercy, Mr. B. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snead v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Mercy, Mr. B. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappelle v. Warden
as 7:2021cv00197
Petitioner:
Mark Augustus Chappelle
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris v. Kessler et al
as 3:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Matthew Parrot, Elliot Kline, East Coast Knights of The Ku Klux Klan and others
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samuel et al v. Mulford
as 1:2018cv01417
Defendant:
Abc Employer I-X, John Does I-X, Melinda B. Mulford and others
Plaintiff:
Augustus A. Samuel, Sr. and Robyn M. Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sines et al v. Kessler et al
as 3:2017cv00072
Defendant:
Matthew Heimbach, Nationalist Front, Augustus Sol Invictus and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 3, Marissa Blair, John Doe and others
Petitioner:
David Duke, James Hart Stern, Denise Y. Lunsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Reid v. Clarke et al
as 3:2016cv00522
Plaintiff:
Elmo Augustus Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Fred Schilling, Mark Amonnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Octave v. Wade et al
as 3:2016cv00338
Plaintiff:
Gloria Juanita Octave
Defendant:
Michael L. Wade, Augustus Edwards, Sara Tolentino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Marshall v. Holloway
as 7:2012cv00123
Respondent:
Holloway
Petitioner:
Augustus Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
