Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Wilfredo Avila-Ramos v. J. Shartle
as 10-4389
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILFREDO AVILA-RAMOS
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden
USA v. Erik Avila-Salgado
as 10-6142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ERIK MANUEL AVILA-SALGADO
Avila v. Hogsten
as 6:2010cv00139
Petitioner:
Roberto Verduzco Avila
Respondent:
Karen Hogsten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Avila-Ramos v. Shartle
as 4:2010cv00994
Petitioner:
Wilfredo Avila-Ramos
Respondent:
J.T. Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carmenza Pinzon-Alfonso, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-3370
Petitioner:
CARMENZA PINZON-ALFONSO, EFRAIN MERCHAN-AVILA and EFRAIN A. MERCHAN-PINZON
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Benner #313057 v. Florence Crane Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2008cv01110
Plaintiff:
David G. Benner #313057
Defendant:
Florence Crane Correctional Facility, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Carol Howes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Bella Vista, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Bella Vista, Inc. and Cindy Avila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv15175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Avila v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
as 3:2007cv01071
Plaintiff:
Shirley Avila and Shirley Avila
Defendant:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Guerrero et al v. Brickman Group, LLC
as 1:2007cv01040
Plaintiff:
Juan Reymundo Guerrero, Arturo Roberto Alvarez-Lopez, Roberto Saiz Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Brickman Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
